Decision came ‘following disruption at some events’, university says
“If universities are serious about addressing antisemitism and making Jews feel welcome at their institution, they should follow KCL’s example and adopt the [ antisemitism definition ].”
King’s College London has become one of the first British universities to adopt the broader International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism.
A KCL spokesperson said the decision was made “following disruption at some events organised by student societies earlier in the year”.
Video footage showed scores of student activists lining the hallway outside Mr Meridor’s talk as they chanted loudly, waved placards and shouted anti-Israel slogans.
The protesters called Mr Meridor a war criminal and labelled Israel a terrorist state.
In January 2016, police were called to an event organised by KCL’s Israel society.
More than 100 people had come to hear Ami Ayalon, the former head of Israel’s Shin Bet security service, speak.
Two Jewish students were subjected to a volley of abuse, including being called “Nazis”, as they held off a mob of demonstrators.
One of the pro-Palestinian protestors was later found guilty of assault by beating after hitting the President of the Israel society.
The IHRA’s antisemitism definition includes “denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination… by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavour” or “applying double standards by requiring of it a behaviour not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation” as well as “using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism to characterize Israel or Israelis”.
It also covers comparing Israeli policy to the Nazis and “holding Jews collectively responsible” for it.
Last year, another London university, Soas refused to adopt the IHRA definition.
At the time, then-President of the Board of Deputies, Jonathan Arkush, described his meeting with the university’s vice chancellor, Baroness Amos, as the worst he had ever had with a senior university official.
He claimed she told him the definition was “contentious”.
Read More: The JC